Julia Spivack is a qualified osteopath, a few years ago she had a vexatious complaint made against her and since has devoted much of her time to exposing the way health regulators operate. She used all the proper channels as advocated by the chiropractic associations who have stated the have no confidence in the way the GCC is regulating the chiropractic profession. in December 2010
This is what she has written to two prime ministers one Labour another a conservative “The General Osteopathic Council (GOsC) abuses its statutory duties and powers to tell lies, to fabricate complaints against practitioners and to kill practitioners and members of the public and damage patients in a calculated cold-blooded fashion”.
Like me she has been referred to the CHRE and has had lengthy exchange with the CHRE going back to the autumn of 2007 over the destructive behaviour of the GOsC.
They also said, (like bonuses to bankers) there was nothing they could do about the regulators. The Privy council have said the same.
She got in touch and interviewed myself and a number of other chiropractors and concluded that the GCC was also failing in their primary duty to protect the public and grossly abusing their statutory powers to the serious detriment of patients and practitioners and their families. Julia told them that she had resigned from the Osteopathic register of the GOsC because it poses a “danger to patients”. I told her she was wasting her time and this is the most recent letter from the DOH washing their hands of the matter. What is amusing about this letter I had an almost identical one in 2006 from another “Sir Humphrey” at the DOH.
“The GOsC was created by an Act of Parliament (Osteopath’s Act 1993) and as you say provided with a “legislative framework” by government. If they were created by Parliament then government ought to have ultimate jurisdiction over them. However you are telling me that once created by government these quangos are free to do as they like including killing people and wrecking lives with no accountability to anyone but themselves.
As the government has no control over these “regulators” once they have been created then they are legally void in our sovereign constitution and therefore their remit is fraudulent. Thus they are outlaws, brigands and criminals which explains why the behave like criminals.
Dr Julia Spivack BSc (Hons), DO, MSCC, MICO, Dip Hom, MSc (Ayur)
Independent primary care physician in natural medicine.
Mr David Cameron PM; Ms Nadine Dorries MP ; Mr David Tredinnick MP”
For those of you considering of taking a complaint to the GCC, (you must take care not to criticise the registrar, the chief executive, returning officer, secretary to the committees, etc etc Margaret Coats )this is the process http://www.chiropracticlive.com/?p=580 fortunately like blue Peter I have a few investigations which I prepared earlier and that will be the next posting I do. These regulators have a statutory duty to protect the public, how can anyone have any credibility in them when there is no one who can hold them to account when they have all been appointed to their positions by the very people who have been unable to regulate competently . You could not make this up could you.
- Department of Health plans for Regulatory Reform of GCC
- Department of Health or Privy Council are not interested in the failures of the General Chiropractic Council to fulfil its statutory duty
- How are the General Chiropractic Council and the British Chiropractic Council going to deal with Zeno’s complaints