GCC defines “subluxtion”

January 3, 2007
By

Unfortunately chiropractic like medical undergraduates have little discussion concerning the philosophy of health and yet it is an essential part of the way in which we understand the world. This omission from chiropractic education may explain why the extreme wings off the profession are guided by dogma and the evangelical teachings of their chiropractic leaders.

How many chiropractic colleges embrace the educational principals of education psychologist Jean Piaget.
“ The principal goal of education is to create people who are capable of doing new things, not simply of repeating what other generations have done – people who are creative, inventive, and discoverers. The second goal is to form a mindset which can be critical, can verify, and not accept everything that is offered”

For one hundred years chiropractors fought to protect its unique identity. The enemy is no longer a zealous American Medical Association or even critics like Professor Edzard Earnst, merely an obstacle chiropractic academics can not overcome. The enemy are those among our own ranks who want to force all chiropractors to take the path they are on. They pontificate about “unity” when the mean forcing non believers to follow their dogma, rather than respect the diversity that is chiropractic linked by the recognition that there is a relationship between the structure of the spine the function of the nervous system and wellbeing. A theoretical model of vertebral motion segment dysfunction, that incorporates the complex interactions (homeostasis / innate), of pathologic changes in nerve, muscle, ligamentous vascular and connective tissues that affects adaptability to physical, chemical and emotional stresses and compromises general wellbeing. Adapted from Meredil Gaterman 2006 subluxation

Gaterman has published in 2006 the most authoritive book on chiropractic theory setting the tone early on by stating “When it comes to communicating the language of "vertebral subluxation theory" chiropractors struggle  Adopting the approach of Humpty Dumpty in Lewis Carrols Through the Looking Glass “…..when I use a word, Humpty Dumpty said in a rather scornful tone, “it means what I chose it to mean- neither more or less….” One of the greatest challenges facing the chiropractic profession today is simply to learn to communicate with each other , our clients, and other profession.

 
A classic example of this has just been published on the GCC website,under ”Frequently asked Questions”

Q

What is subluxation and is it dangerous?
A. As used by chiropractors, the term ‘subluxation’ doesn’t mean something that poses any danger to you. A subluxation is simply the name given to a joint that does not function and/or move as well as it can. Alternatively, a chiropractor may say a joint is misaligned. This may influence the way the body functions.

They only people who would describe a “subluxation” in those terms are chiropractors who do not use the term and believe a subluxation is the same as a fixation. It is no longer tenable to look at joint restriction merely from a mechanical perspective. I will never forget when the BCA rejected the ACC parading and BCA president Mike Barber stated it was because there was no mention of fixation only subluxation; “there is not always neurological involvement in the chiropractic lesion?? I pointed out to him, only fixations in cadavers are without neurological involvement. There is no neurological involvement when people are dead, unfortunately the BCA has many of these people who were trained in the dark ages speaking for the chiropractic profession 

Makes you wonder how the GCC came up with this definition?

Share Button

Tags: ,

15 Responses to GCC defines “subluxtion”

  1. Travis Lineweaver on March 28, 2020 at 06:28

    I was very pleased to find this web-site.I wanted to thanks for your time for this wonderful read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you blog post.

  2. Les Pfeifle on March 27, 2020 at 10:33

    An impressive share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a little analysis on this. And he in fact bought me breakfast because I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love reading more on this topic. If possible, as you become expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more details? It is highly helpful for me. Big thumb up for this blog post!

  3. Lavern Cyphers on March 26, 2020 at 04:03

    There is noticeably a bundle to know about this. I assume you made certain nice points in features also.

  4. Refugia Cowlin on March 22, 2020 at 15:31

    This really answered my problem, thank you!

  5. Chung Mcgrogan on March 22, 2020 at 12:08

    I am often to blogging and i really appreciate your content. The article has really peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your site and keep checking for new information.

  6. Clair Craige on March 22, 2020 at 09:18

    Hello! I just would like to give a huge thumbs up for the great info you have here on this post. I will be coming back to your blog for more soon.

  7. Jose Nevala on March 18, 2020 at 07:00

    Aw, this was a really nice post. In idea I would like to put in writing like this additionally ? taking time and actual effort to make a very good article? but what can I say? I procrastinate alot and by no means seem to get something done.

  8. Linwood Lomedico on March 17, 2020 at 14:24

    Can I just say what a relief to find someone who actually knows what theyre talking about on the internet. You definitely know how to bring an issue to light and make it important. More people need to read this and understand this side of the story. I cant believe youre not more popular because you definitely have the gift.

  9. Jamison Mcvey on March 17, 2020 at 13:59

    I?d have to check with you here. Which is not something I usually do! I enjoy reading a post that will make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to comment!

  10. Dan Reel on March 17, 2020 at 13:32

    There is noticeably a bundle to know about this. I assume you made certain nice points in features also.

  11. Wilda Hartshorn on March 17, 2020 at 05:15

    I?d have to check with you here. Which is not something I usually do! I enjoy reading a post that will make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to comment!

  12. Hailey Monat on March 16, 2020 at 17:15

    There are some interesting points in time in this article but I don?t know if I see all of them center to heart. There is some validity but I will take hold opinion until I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we want more! Added to FeedBurner as well

  13. Alden Fickas on March 16, 2020 at 16:59

    Hey, Came across this page by accident but absolutely loving the content. Thanks.

  14. Richard Lanigan on May 25, 2010 at 00:45

    Ten years ago I was an expert opposite Dafid Byfield who was arguing that subluxation was a clinical myth. I suggested he read Gatterman he said he had. I suspected from that point the man was a fool and as dogmatic as any extremist

  15. Donald Scott on May 24, 2010 at 19:28

    GCC defines “subluxtion”(sic)

    The physiological evidence and the historical development were illustrated expertly by Gatterman, and her book is relevant also for physiotherapists, osteopaths, bodyworkers as well as the chiropractic community. The somato-visceral (and vice verse) reflexes are useful markers that help us map our patient’s spinal patterns, and are a link to the internal constellation of the body’s regulatory systems.

    You could say a solitary example of useful regulation in practice!

    Gatterman’s book is superb. Buy it and enjoy your heritage….

Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: